Grass

Holding GRASS pays nothing; staking rewards come from router incentives, but delegation is passive and there is no slashing.

Riba is interest or any guaranteed increase on a loan. GRASS has no lending function. Holders delegate to routers, which do the work of routing traffic, and share their rewards minus commission; a 30 million GRASS pool funds router rewards until network fees take over. Nobody borrows the tokens, but delegators earn without work and slashing is not implemented, so the score is just below the maximum.

GRASS is the staking token of a working data network with real revenue.

This criterion asks whether the asset has real value as property (mal). GRASS is staked to the routers of a network that reported $17 million in revenue in H1 2026. Sharlife rates it permissible, so the general scholarly debate about crypto is reflected in confidence rather than this score.

GRASS is a network token, not a game of chance.

Maysir is gambling: gaining or losing by chance rather than through productive exchange. GRASS has no lottery or meme mechanics; users earn by sharing bandwidth. No coin-specific gambling feature is documented, so the criterion is at the maximum.

Grass earns by selling public web data to AI and enterprise buyers.

This criterion asks how the project earns. Grass sells structured public web data to AI companies and enterprises and pays contributors in USDC. It says it handles only public pages, not personal data. No source shows interest-based or other impermissible revenue, so the criterion is at the maximum.

Allocation is published, but insiders hold 70% and it is unclear how revenue reaches token holders.

Gharar is excessive uncertainty or hidden information. Grass publishes its allocation and vesting. Two concrete points lower the score within pass: investors, contributors and the foundation hold 70% of supply, and the sources reviewed do not explain how the network's dollar revenue benefits GRASS holders or stakers. Traffic is also concentrated, with about 150,000 users carrying about 90% of it.

GRASS is used for staking to routers in a working network.

This criterion looks at what the asset is actually used for. GRASS is delegated to routers that carry network traffic. No impermissible primary use is documented, so the criterion is at the maximum.

Fully paid spot GRASS is available on exchanges and Solana DEXs and can be held in any Solana wallet.

This criterion asks whether the asset can be owned in a permissible way. GRASS trades spot and is an ordinary SPL token that can be held in self-custody. Ownership does not depend on derivatives or leverage, so the criterion is at the maximum.

Grass pays ordinary users for idle bandwidth and supplies data for AI; no concrete harm is documented.

Maslahah weighs benefit against harm. Grass has paid about $3 million in USDC to 6.29 million contributors and says it never touches personal data. No source collected documents misuse of the network or a security incident, so the criterion is at the maximum.