Stellar
XLM#16XLM is the native coin of Stellar, a blockchain for payments and tokenised assets.
- Market cap
- $7.58B
- Volume 24h
- $249.44M
- All-time high
- —
- Circulating supply
- 35.06B of 50B
Passes all 8 Shariah criteria.
- 8 pass
- 0 caution
- 0 fail
Verdict history
- HalalCurrent
First publication
Fundamentals, market picture and news will appear here.
Halal analysis
Can a Muslim hold Stellar?8 Shariah criteria
8 pass · 0 caution · 0 failHolding XLM pays nothing: there is no staking, no inflation since 2019, and fees are locked away rather than paid to anyone.
Riba means interest or any guaranteed increase on a loan. XLM has no built-in return of any kind. Stellar has no staking: validators are not paid and there is 'no concept of staking tokens'. The 1% yearly inflation that once paid new lumens to accounts that voted for it was ended by validator vote on 28 October 2019. Transaction fees go into a locked pool that no one can spend. Interest can only arise if a holder chooses to lend XLM on a platform, which is assessed under trading mechanisms, not as a feature of the coin, so the criterion gets the full score.
Stellar is a working payment network and XLM is needed to use it.
Mal is property that Islamic law recognises as having value and that can be owned and traded. Stellar clearly works: SDF reported 10.7 million active accounts and $11.4 billion of stablecoin transfers in Q2 2026, and every account must hold XLM as a minimum balance and pay fees in it. In 2018 the Bahrain-licensed Shariyah Review Bureau certified Stellar for payments and tokenisation, including uses of XLM, and screeners such as Sharlife, Islamic Finance Guru, ShariaQuant and CryptoUmmah rate it favourably; these are tier-2 views commissioned or published by advisory firms.
Tier-1 bodies disagree on cryptocurrency in general: Malaysia's SC Shariah Advisory Council treats unbacked digital currency as tradable goods on registered exchanges, while Egypt's Dar al-Ifta, the UAE General Authority of Islamic Affairs, Turkey's Diyanet and Indonesia's MUI prohibit dealing in it and the OIC Fiqh Academy deferred a ruling. None of them names Stellar, and that general dispute is reflected in confidence, not in this score. Islamic Finance Guru, the authoritative source, rates XLM permissible, so the criterion gets the full score.
- Q2 2026: What Stellar was built for has arrived (Stellar Development Foundation)
- Lumens (XLM): Stellar developer docs
- Stellar First DLT to Obtain Sharia Certification for Payments & Asset Tokenization (Stellar Development Foundation)
- Resolutions of the Shariah Advisory Council of the SC - Securities Commission Malaysia
XLM is not a gambling token and the network is used mainly for payments, but most XLM trading on the largest exchange is in futures.
Maysir is gambling: winning or losing by chance rather than through productive exchange. Ordinary price swings are not maysir, and XLM has no chance-based payout. Stellar also lacks a large memecoin or betting scene: its on-chain activity is dominated by stablecoin transfers (about $10 billion over 30 days in September 2026, per rwa.xyz) and tokenised assets. The trading of XLM itself is speculative, though: on 27 September 2026 perpetual futures were about 83% of XLM/USDT volume on Binance (a single-day snapshot on one exchange), and XLM trades about 75% below its January 2018 peak.
Because XLM has a real function and no chance-based mechanics, the futures-heavy market lowers the score only within pass.
The protocol earns nothing for anyone and validators are unpaid; the SDF's own investment income is not published but does not flow to XLM holders.
This criterion asks how the issuer or protocol earns, and whether any of that income is impermissible. Stellar has no company collecting revenue for XLM holders: transaction fees go into a locked account 'not given to or used by anyone', and validators receive no block rewards or fee share. The closest thing to an issuer is the Stellar Development Foundation, a non-profit that holds about 14.8 billion XLM and uses it to fund development, grants and investments in companies and protocols.
SDF does not publish a revenue breakdown of its investment portfolio, and some ecosystem businesses it supports deal in interest-bearing products, so this is recorded as a data gap; it is not income flowing to XLM holders. No impermissible income reaching XLM holders was found, so the criterion gets the full score.
Supply is fixed and the code is open; the foundation controls about 30% of all XLM and is re-organising how it discloses those holdings.
Gharar is excessive uncertainty or hidden information in a deal. Much of Stellar is transparent: supply has been fixed at about 50 billion XLM since inflation ended in 2019, the software is open source, protocol upgrades need validator votes, and the ledger shows every account. The main uncertainty is concentration. SDF holds about 14.76 billion XLM (about 29.5% of supply) across four buckets and can sell, grant or invest it under its mandate; this overhang is larger than most planned token unlocks.
On 26 September 2026 SDF's mandate page said it was updating the allocation of its assets and that real-time public balances would be made available again, so the current plan for these coins is not fully disclosed. CryptoUmmah also cites SDF governance concentration. SDF cannot create new XLM or move other people's XLM, so the criterion passes; the concentration and the paused disclosure keep the score below the maximum.
Stellar is mainly a payment rail; most of its tokenised assets are interest-bearing government debt and funds, and lending leads its small DeFi sector.
This criterion looks at what the network is actually used for. Much of it is permissible: stablecoin payments and remittances (a record $11.4 billion of transfers in Q2 2026), MoneyGram's MGUSD, USDC, EURC and, since September 2026, USDT0. A notable share is interest-based. Of about $3.4 billion of tokenised real-world assets, most is tokenised Treasury bills, bonds and money market funds, such as Spiko's T-bill funds ($1.7 billion), Ondo ($536 million) and Franklin Templeton's BENJI ($514 million), plus Figure's yield-bearing dollar YLDS.
Tokenising interest-bearing assets on Stellar does not make XLM itself interest-bearing: XLM only pays the fees for these transfers. But it means a large part of the network's economic activity is interest-based finance. In DeFi, the Blend lending pools hold about $163 million, about 61% of Stellar's $267 million TVL. Payments remain the main purpose, so the criterion passes, but the large interest-based share keeps the score well below the maximum.
Fully paid spot XLM is widely available and can be held in one's own wallet.
This criterion asks whether the asset can be owned in a permissible way. XLM trades spot, with full payment and delivery, on major exchanges such as Binance, and it can be withdrawn to a self-custody Stellar wallet where the owner controls it directly. In the US it is also held by the Grayscale Stellar Lumens Trust, which is quoted over the counter, holds only XLM and says it uses no leverage or derivatives. Ownership therefore does not depend on derivatives or leveraged wrappers, so the criterion gets the full score.
Stellar brings clear benefit as a cheap remittance and payment rail, with no major abuse pattern found.
Maslahah weighs public benefit against harm. The benefit is clear: Stellar was built to move money cheaply across borders, fees average about one hundredth of a cent, and it links digital wallets to cash networks such as MoneyGram, which matters for remittances. SDF reported 99.99%+ uptime and no core protocol security incidents in the first half of 2026. Stellar has no mining, so its energy use is small. No large pattern of fraud or sanctions evasion tied to the network was found in this review, though this was not researched in depth.
The speculative trading of XLM is counted under maysir, not again here, so the criterion gets the full score.
How you can use it
Tap a card for the ruling and sourcesBuying XLM with full payment and immediate delivery is widely available on major exchanges, and coins can be moved to a self-custody Stellar wallet. Spot is the acceptable way to hold XLM.
No exchange-listed XLM ETF was found in the US. The Grayscale Stellar Lumens Trust (GXLM), quoted over the counter, holds only XLM, reported no investment income in its March 2026 quarterly report and says it uses no leverage or derivatives, but that report does not state whether its XLM may be lent or staked, and it charges 2.5% a year. A fund that holds XLM itself would be assessed like spot once its lending and staking terms are checked. Funds in other countries were not reviewed.
Tier-1 bodies such as Indonesia's MUI rule that using cryptocurrency as currency is not permissible, and several countries restrict paying with crypto. Most payments on Stellar are made in stablecoins, with XLM paying only the network fee.
Not available natively: Stellar has no staking and validators are unpaid. Products sold as 'XLM staking' by exchanges or apps are really earn or lending programmes, whose return must come from somewhere other than the protocol; check the source product by product.
Margin trading in XLM is offered on major exchanges but is never acceptable: it is a deferred exchange with borrowed money and leverage (AAOIFI SS 20).
XLM perpetual futures were about 83% of XLM/USDT volume on Binance in a single-day snapshot, but futures, perpetuals and options always fail under AAOIFI SS 20: deferred exchange without delivery, usually with leverage.
Lending XLM in Blend lending pools or through exchange lending programmes pays depositors interest from borrowers. This is riba.
XLM itself pays nothing, so XLM yield products get their return from lending (fail). Providing liquidity to Stellar's built-in automated market makers earns a share of trading fees rather than interest; ShariaQuant rates it doubtful, and it is closer to caution, but check each product's source of return.
Scholars quotes
Therefore, simply buying and holding XLM is Halal.The opinion on this is the same as doing the same with any halal assets such as shares – 1) is permissible, 2) is more debatable and there are differing opinions on short-term trading.Stellar is halal and was one of the first blockchain networks to receive a shariah-compliant certification.Stellar (XLM) is listed as a digital asset on Recognized Market Operators approved by the Securities Commission of Malaysia to operate a Digital Asset Exchange, indicating that it has passed the Shariah evaluation by the Shariah Advisory Council of the Securities Commission Malaysia.Stellar is the first distributed ledger protocol to receive Sharia compliance certification in the money transfer and asset tokenization space.As I mentioned at the beginning of this article it is not necessary to substantiate the permissibility of something as long as there are no prohibited factors involved in it or surrounding it.Penggunaan cryptocurrency sebagai mata uang hukumnya haram, karena mengandung gharar (ketidakjelasan), dharar (bahaya) dan bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang nomor 7 tahun 2011 tentang Mata Uang dan Peraturan Bank Indonesia nomor 17 tahun 2015 tentang Kewajiban Penggunaan Rupiah di Wilayah Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia.Sebagaimana mata wang yang lain, mata wang digital hendaklah tidak digunakan sebagai bayaran kepada barangan, perkhidmatan dan aktiviti tidak patuh Syariah seperti pembelian dadah, pelacuran, perjudian dan pendanaan aktiviti keganasan serta penggubahan wang haram.The SAC has also resolved that investment and trading of Digital Assets that fulfil the above requirements and which are traded on Digital Asset Exchange (DAX) registered with SC are permissible.Third: In light of the above and given the significant risks associated with this type of currencies and the instability of their transactions, the Council of the Academy recommends pursuing research and studies on issues affecting its ruling.Bitcoin is a digital currency that does not meet the legal and Sharia criteria that make it a currency subject to the rulings of dealing with official legal currencies recognized internationally.بناءً على ذلك: فلا يجوز شرعًا تداول عملة "البتكوين" والتعامل من خلالها بالبيعِ والشراءِ والإجارةِ وغيرها، بل يُمنع من الاشتراكِ فيها؛ لعدمِ اعتبارِها كوسيطٍ مقبولٍ للتبادلِ من الجهاتِ المخُتصَّةِ، ولِمَا تشتمل عليه من الضررِ الناشئ عن الغررِ والجهالةِ والغشِّ في مَصْرِفها ومِعْيارها وقِيمتها، فضلًا عما تؤدي إليه ممارستُها من مخاطرَ عاليةٍ على الأفراد والدول.According to research and opinion of experts so far, cryptocurrency is not considered ‘ maal ’ (wealth) in Sharia.Muhammadiyah memandang transaksi dan investasi kripto pada dasarnya mubah (boleh) tetapi dengan syarat tertentu.Our current position is 'tawaquf'; we can't say it is halal or haram, but we say it is better not to engage in itAI-assisted analysis checked against sources. Not a fatwa or investment advice.
Where it trades
Section in preparation
Similar halal assets
Halal verdict, same category