LayerZero
ZRO#79ZRO is the governance token of LayerZero, a protocol that carries messages and tokens between blockchains.
- Market cap
- $705.34M
- Volume 24h
- $206.26M
- All-time high
- —
- Circulating supply
- 398.13M of 1B
Passes all 8 Shariah criteria.
- 8 pass
- 0 caution
- 0 fail
Verdict history
- HalalCurrent
First publication
Fundamentals, market picture and news will appear here.
Halal analysis
Can a Muslim hold LayerZero?8 Shariah criteria
8 pass · 0 caution · 0 failHolding ZRO pays no interest, and the protocol has no lending function.
Riba is interest or any guaranteed increase on a loan. ZRO is a governance token; LayerZero charges for carrying messages, and ZRO repurchases are funded by Stargate bridge revenue, not by interest. Sharlife, the first authoritative source that rates LayerZero, marks it compliant, and CryptoUmmah also finds no interest mechanism. Staking terms on the planned Zero network are not public; that is a data gap, not a found problem, so the criterion is at the maximum.
ZRO governs working cross-chain infrastructure used by many applications.
Mal is property that Islamic law recognises as having value. ZRO gives votes over a live interoperability protocol, its fee switch and the Zero network. Sharlife rates LayerZero permissible, so the general debate on whether crypto is property is reflected in confidence rather than in this score.
ZRO has no chance-based payout or game mechanics.
Maysir is gambling: gaining or losing by chance rather than through productive exchange. ZRO is a governance token of infrastructure and has no lottery or meme feature; ordinary price swings are not maysir. CryptoUmmah lowers its own maysir score for speculation, but no coin-specific gambling mechanism is documented, so the criterion is at the maximum.
LayerZero earns from message and bridge fees; repurchases are funded by Stargate revenue.
This criterion asks how the protocol earns. LayerZero is paid for verifying and delivering cross-chain messages, and the Foundation reports repurchasing 2,375,357 ZRO for $3,329,282 from Stargate bridge revenue between September 2025 and August 2026. These are fees for a service. ATLAS, launched in August 2026, would use 75% of its post-rebate trading fees to buy and burn ZRO; which markets it will host was not confirmed and is noted as a data gap. No interest-based or other impermissible revenue was found, so the criterion is at the maximum.
Supply is fixed and code is audited, but insiders hold 57.7% of supply and an exploit exposed weak default verifier setups.
Gharar is excessive uncertainty or hidden information. ZRO supply is fixed at 1 billion, allocations are published and the Foundation publishes its repurchases. Two concrete points lower the score within pass. Strategic partners and core contributors hold 57.7% of final supply, with about 35% circulating and unlocks running into 2027.
And in April 2026 attackers drained about $292 million from Kelp DAO's LayerZero bridge, which used a single verifier; Kelp says LayerZero approved that setup and sued in September 2026, while LayerZero says its contracts were not affected and now refuses 1-of-1 setups.
ZRO is used to govern a messaging protocol and, on ATLAS, to earn venue fee rebates.
This criterion looks at what the asset is actually used for. ZRO is used for governance votes, including the six-monthly fee switch vote, and venues can stake it on ATLAS for fee rebates. These are permissible uses, and no impermissible main use is documented, so the criterion is at the maximum.
Fully paid spot ZRO is widely available and can be held in a self-custody wallet.
This criterion asks whether the asset can be owned in a permissible way. ZRO trades spot with full payment and delivery on major exchanges and is an ordinary token that can be withdrawn to a self-custody wallet on several networks. Ownership does not depend on derivatives or leverage, so the criterion is at the maximum.
LayerZero is useful infrastructure, but a $292 million exploit hit users of an application built on it.
Maslahah weighs benefit against harm. LayerZero lets assets and messages move between many blockchains, a real public benefit. A concrete harm is the April 2026 Kelp DAO exploit: attackers linked by LayerZero to North Korea's Lazarus Group drained about $292 million through a single-verifier bridge on LayerZero, and responsibility is now disputed in court. LayerZero has since stopped signing for 1-of-1 setups. The criterion stays in pass with a lower score.
How you can use it
Tap a card for the ruling and sourcesBuying ZRO with full payment and immediate delivery is widely available, and the tokens can be moved to a self-custody wallet. Spot purchase and holding are acceptable at this verdict.
No ZRO exchange-traded fund was found. A product that holds ZRO itself would be judged like spot; its structure would need to be checked.
ZRO is not mainly a means of payment. Tier-1 bodies such as Indonesia's MUI rule that using cryptocurrency as currency is not permissible.
ZRO has no proof-of-stake validation of its own. On ATLAS, venues stake ZRO to receive trading-fee rebates, and the terms of any staking on the Zero network are not yet public; each product must be checked for where the return comes from.
Margin trading in ZRO is offered by some exchanges but is never acceptable: it is a deferred exchange with borrowed money and leverage (AAOIFI SS 20).
ZRO futures and perpetuals are offered by derivatives exchanges, but futures, perpetuals and options always fail under AAOIFI SS 20: deferred exchange without delivery, usually with leverage.
Lending ZRO through exchange or DeFi lending programmes pays depositors interest from borrowers. This is riba.
Exchange 'earn' products and lending pools on ZRO pay a return funded by lending interest; this is treated as interest whatever it is called.
Scholars quotes
The opinion on this is the same as doing the same with any halal assets such as shares – 1) is permissible, 2) is more debatable and there are differing opinions on short-term trading.As I mentioned at the beginning of this article it is not necessary to substantiate the permissibility of something as long as there are no prohibited factors involved in it or surrounding it.Penggunaan cryptocurrency sebagai mata uang hukumnya haram, karena mengandung gharar (ketidakjelasan), dharar (bahaya) dan bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang nomor 7 tahun 2011 tentang Mata Uang dan Peraturan Bank Indonesia nomor 17 tahun 2015 tentang Kewajiban Penggunaan Rupiah di Wilayah Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia.Sebagaimana mata wang yang lain, mata wang digital hendaklah tidak digunakan sebagai bayaran kepada barangan, perkhidmatan dan aktiviti tidak patuh Syariah seperti pembelian dadah, pelacuran, perjudian dan pendanaan aktiviti keganasan serta penggubahan wang haram.The SAC has also resolved that investment and trading of Digital Assets that fulfil the above requirements and which are traded on Digital Asset Exchange (DAX) registered with SC are permissible.Third: In light of the above and given the significant risks associated with this type of currencies and the instability of their transactions, the Council of the Academy recommends pursuing research and studies on issues affecting its ruling.Bitcoin is a digital currency that does not meet the legal and Sharia criteria that make it a currency subject to the rulings of dealing with official legal currencies recognized internationally.بناءً على ذلك: فلا يجوز شرعًا تداول عملة "البتكوين" والتعامل من خلالها بالبيعِ والشراءِ والإجارةِ وغيرها، بل يُمنع من الاشتراكِ فيها؛ لعدمِ اعتبارِها كوسيطٍ مقبولٍ للتبادلِ من الجهاتِ المخُتصَّةِ، ولِمَا تشتمل عليه من الضررِ الناشئ عن الغررِ والجهالةِ والغشِّ في مَصْرِفها ومِعْيارها وقِيمتها، فضلًا عما تؤدي إليه ممارستُها من مخاطرَ عاليةٍ على الأفراد والدول.According to research and opinion of experts so far, cryptocurrency is not considered ‘ maal ’ (wealth) in Sharia.Muhammadiyah memandang transaksi dan investasi kripto pada dasarnya mubah (boleh) tetapi dengan syarat tertentu.Our current position is 'tawaquf'; we can't say it is halal or haram, but we say it is better not to engage in itAI-assisted analysis checked against sources. Not a fatwa or investment advice.
Where it trades
Section in preparation
Similar halal assets
Halal verdict, same category