AIOZ Network

Holding AIOZ pays nothing; staking rewards are variable pay for validation, and validators and delegators both face slashing.

Riba is interest or any guaranteed increase on a loan. AIOZ staking rewards come from inflation and fees and are paid for securing the network. The amount varies, and if a validator misbehaves both it and its delegators lose part of their stake, with a 4-week unbonding period. That is shared risk, not a loan with a fixed return. Sharlife, the first authoritative source that rates AIOZ, lists it as permissible. No interest mechanism is documented, so the criterion is at the maximum.

AIOZ is the native token of a working chain and pays node operators for storage, streaming and computing.

This criterion asks whether the asset has real value as property (mal). AIOZ pays transaction fees, is staked to secure the chain and rewards the nodes that store and deliver data. Sharlife lists it as permissible. The general scholarly dispute about crypto is reflected in confidence, not here, so the criterion is at the maximum.

AIOZ is a utility token with no chance-based mechanics.

Maysir is gambling: gaining or losing by chance rather than through productive exchange. AIOZ rewards measurable work by nodes and validators and has no lottery or betting feature. No concrete gambling problem is documented, so the criterion is at the maximum.

The network earns from storage, streaming, pinning and AI services.

This criterion asks how the project earns. AIOZ infrastructure revenue comes from customers who pay for storage, streaming, pinning and AI computing; 5% of these revenues is burned. No interest income or other impermissible revenue is documented, so the criterion is at the maximum.

Inflation and burn rules are published, but half of new tokens go to a treasury and independent audit evidence is weak.

Gharar is excessive uncertainty or hidden information. The inflation schedule, the split of new tokens and the burn rules are published. Two concrete points keep the score below the maximum: half of all newly issued AIOZ goes to a treasury spent at the project's discretion, and CryptoUmmah scores audit quality at 50 out of 100 and rates gharar as moderate. Sharlife still lists AIOZ as permissible, so the status stays pass.

AIOZ is used for storage, streaming and AI services, fees and staking.

This criterion looks at what the asset is actually used for. The network stores and delivers files and video and runs AI models; AIOZ pays for and rewards that work. These uses are permissible and no prohibited use specific to the network is documented, so the criterion is at the maximum.

Fully paid spot AIOZ is available on major exchanges and can be self-custodied.

This criterion asks whether the asset can be owned in a permissible way. AIOZ trades spot on Coinbase, HTX, Bybit, KuCoin and others, and can be held in a self-custody wallet on its own chain, Ethereum or BNB Chain. The criterion is at the maximum.

The network gives cheaper storage and delivery and pays ordinary people for spare resources; no harm specific to AIOZ was found.

Maslahah weighs benefit against harm. AIOZ lets people earn from spare storage, bandwidth and computing power and gives apps an alternative to centralised cloud services. No source collected documents fraud or a hack involving AIOZ, so the criterion is at the maximum.